Home Politics Was Kavanaugh Accuser Almost Raped By His Doppelgänger? A New Theory Emerges

Was Kavanaugh Accuser Almost Raped By His Doppelgänger? A New Theory Emerges


A new theory has emerged in the case of whether Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted accuser Christine Blasey Ford roughly 35 years ago; it was Kavanaugh’s high school look-alike, whose high school house better fits Ford’s description, and who kept in touch with the other guy allegedly in the room, Mark Judge.

The theory was presented Thursday afternoon by Ed Whelan, a former clerk to USSC Justice Antonin Scalia and currently president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC), a conservative think tank. Using entirely circumstantial evidence which could certainly ruin the life of the man at the center of the new theory, Whelan suggests that Kavanaugh’s high school doppelgänger, Chris Garrett, may have in fact been responsible for Blasey Ford’s recollection of the alleged incident.

Brett Kavanaugh (left), Chris Garrett

Earlier this week, Whelan tweeted “By one week from today, I expect that Judge Kavanaugh will have been clearly vindicated on this matter. Specifically, I expect that compelling evidence will show his categorical denial to be truthful. There will be no cloud over him.” 

Update: Ford, who has had trouble remembering specifics about the alleged encounter, dismissed Whelan’s theory in a statement late Thursday according to the Washington Post: “I knew them both, and socialized with” the other classmate, Ford said, adding that she had once visited him in the hospital. “There is zero chance that I would confuse them.”

Here is Whelan’s theory: 

In response to Whelan’s theory, New York Times columnist Ross Douthat tweeted: “I don’t know Brett Kavanaugh, which has made it easier for me than for conservatives closer to the man to believe he might be guilty. I do know Ed Whelan, which makes me assume there’s more reason to believe the doppelganger theory than just what he just tweeted. We’ll see.”


via www.zerohedge.com


  1. Could this “theor”y just be a cover story to avoid perjury charges because even its defenders know the bitch is lying? Just saying;-)!!!

    • Would like to know if any of those political witches ever had an offer from a 17 yr. old, or maybe even accepting and loving it while in High School………Those 17 yr. olds didn’t care what those witches looked like, just anxious to dip their wick.

  2. It is clearly a case of the Democratic party stooping to a new low and again giving a bad name to the once respectable profession of prostitution.

  3. Back in the day, such things happened often—more often in the back seats of cars. And the girls knew how to handle it. While they were uncomfortable events, the girls were not raped, injured, nor their feelings hurt. And the guys usually wound up embarrassed and humiliated by the rejection. Why was she at the party anyway? She should have known better. While it doesn’t make the conduct commendable; it certainly should be dealt with in perspective.

  4. Here the Dems go again…guilty until proven innocent, with an impossible 35 year lapse, with absolutely no proof, other than on the woman’s say-so, whose memory is sketchy on any pertinent facts! Why wait 36 years to say something, if this did happen, and especially since it was so tramatic for her, as she claims! It is just too conveniently timed, and when one thinks the Dems can’t sink any lower….THEY DO! These types of things, and the embarrassment of Bill Clinton, is the reason I am no longer a Democrat! My Father and Mother were staunch Democrats, and I am sure they are turning in their graves at the party now!

  5. Was it Professor Ford who touched my butt when leaving class . . . or the guy behind me?
    Can’t remember the day, month or year, not sure if it happened, remember only that class was boring.
    Do I have a case to warrant an FBI investigation?
    Do I need to call some “Me Too” lawyer.
    Will the Dems pay me to be quiet?
    Will the Repubs pay me to come forward?
    . . . What the hell is going on?

  6. The guy who assaulted Ford would have turned out to be Chris Garrett, and would have been identified as such in Ford’s letter, if Chris Garrett had been the candidate for the Supreme Court. It would have been useless to go after Kavanaugh.

  7. I DO “NOT” BELIEVE THIS CROCK OF LIES. The set-up is too obvious. Appoint Judge Kavanaugh immediately and let this woman try to prove this false accusation ACCORDING TO REAL LAW, and not the Law of Democrat-“tic” demands.
    1. As she promotes her Political LIE, just maybe acquaintances from HER PAST will come forward and describe her reckless Partying ways. I’m sure she pissed off a lot of young men and women in her teenage years………Let’s hear the opposition.
    2. As the FBI became the object of criticism, I doubt any leftover “moles” would want to provide FALSE INVESTIGATION RESULTS as prescribed by the Democrat-“tic” party.
    3. How is anyone allowing HER (well actually DNC) to dictate the hearing??? If you do it for her, you set precedent; what about Juanita Broddrick???? Where is her justice???? She was raped, not just crying wolf as this one is doing.
    4. Maybe its time for Republicans and Trump supporters to start protesting the Democrats’ offices, Celebrities’ Movies, and in front of Media Offices.
    5. DNC is dangerous and really dividing America…….they are trying to start a Revolution.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here