Update: The responses have begun. James Clapper spoke on CNN this afternoon, calling Trump’s actions “a petty way of retribution.”
“Well, it’s interesting news. I’m reading it and learning about it just as you are. I think it’s off the top of my head it’s a sad commentary,”
Clapper said. “For political reasons, this is a petty way of retribution, I suppose for speaking out against the president, which I think, on the part of all of us, are born out of genuine concerns about President Trump.”
“It’s frankly more of a courtesy that former senior officials and the intelligence community are extended the courtesy of keeping the security clearance. Haven’t had a case of using it. And it has no bearing whatsoever on my regard or lack thereof for President Trump or what he’s doing,” he continued.
* * *
President Trump is exploring ways to strip several former Obama officials of their security clearances over politicized statements, including John Brennan, James Clapper, James Comey, Susan Rice, and Andrew McCabe, according to White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders.
Responding to a question about comments tweeted earlier in the day by Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) that former CIA Director Brennan should have his clearance stripped, Sanders replied:
“Not only is the President looking to take away Brennan’s security clearance, he’s also looking into the clearances of Comey, Clapper, Hayden, Rice and McCabe,” said Sanders, reading from a prepared statement, “because they’ve politicized, and in some cases, monetized their public service and security clearances. Making baseless accusations of improper contact with Russia or being influenced by Russia, against the President, is extremely inappropriate.”
“The fact that people with security clearances are making these baseless charges provides inappropriate legitimacy to accusations with zero evidence.” 
Sanders says Trump is considering taking away security clearances from Brennen, Comey, McCabe, Clapper, and Rice "because in some cases they have monetized their security clearances." pic.twitter.com/Y12JYq9Z1R
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) July 23, 2018
It should go without saying, any sitting president should be able to remove a security clearance from a person who is abusing the “privilege.” I agree General Michael Hayden who said he does not receive classified information any more, which is based on the same concept of “need to know.” If a former official is asked for advice on national security, the official can be “inbriefed” as required. Keeping former officials on clearance is extremely costly and unnecessary, especially if they abuse the privilege by politicizing or monetizing it.
ITS ABOUT TIME !EVERYBODY KNOWS HOW CROCKED THEY ARE , AND THEY ALL WORK FOR THE ENEMY ! ” PLEASE TAKE THEIR SECURITY CLEARANCE AWAY ( NOW ) “